Comp AI vs Scrut: which SOC 2 platform fits your switch?
Comp AI scores higher overall on our weights, 5.84 to 5.34. Comp AI leads on switching help, integrations, audit path, and pricing transparency; Scrut leads on framework coverage and AI assistance. They tie on trust center tooling.
What changes if you switch between Comp AI and Scrut?
Moving from Comp AI to Scrut
Comp AI
5.84/10 on this weighting
- HelpFrameworksIntegrationsAuditPricingTrust0AI
Gains on: framework coverage and AI assistance
Gives up: switching help, integrations, audit path, and pricing transparency
| Rank | Platform | Total | Onboarding and switching help difference | Framework coverage and cross-mapping difference | Published integrations difference | Audit path difference | Pricing transparency difference | Questionnaires and trust center difference | AI assistance difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | Scrut | 5.34 out of 10 | -1 | 2 | -4 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 3 |
You gain on framework coverage and AI assistance; you give up switching help, integrations, audit path, and pricing transparency.
Moving from Scrut to Comp AI
Scrut
5.34/10 on this weighting
- HelpFrameworksIntegrationsAuditPricingTrust0AI
Gains on: switching help, integrations, audit path, and pricing transparency
Gives up: framework coverage and AI assistance
| Rank | Platform | Total | Onboarding and switching help difference | Framework coverage and cross-mapping difference | Published integrations difference | Audit path difference | Pricing transparency difference | Questionnaires and trust center difference | AI assistance difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Comp AI | 5.84 out of 10 | 1 | -2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -3 |
You gain on switching help, integrations, audit path, and pricing transparency; you give up framework coverage and AI assistance.
How do Comp AI and Scrut score on each criterion?
| Criterion | Comp AI | Scrut | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Onboarding and switching help · 22 | Comp AI | ||
ReasonsComp AI: Offers 1:1 Slack support with experts; Comp AI says they respond in under 3 minutes (vendor claim). Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: Its startup offer mentions expert guidance and a playbook; the Onboarding Analyst is an AI Teammate rather than a named person. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| Framework coverage and cross-mapping · 16 | Scrut | ||
ReasonsComp AI: Quotes 12 frameworks on its pricing page, including SOC 1, ISO 42001, NEN 7510 and FedRAMP; no total count published. Source: Comp AI pricing · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: States 70+ frameworks on its homepage (60+ on its startup page), with a Unified Control Framework. Source: Scrut for startups · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| Published integrations · 16 | Comp AI | ||
ReasonsComp AI: States 580+ integrations, the highest published count in this lineup. Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: Its Evidence Collector is described as working with AWS, GitHub, Okta and 150+ integrations. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| Audit path · 14 | Comp AI | ||
ReasonsComp AI: Says SOC 2 Type I and II audit-ready in days (vendor claim) and prices audit needs into the quote; the auditor route is not described on pages reviewed. Source: Comp AI pricing · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: An AI Internal Auditor Teammate is described; an external audit route is not described on pages reviewed. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| Pricing transparency · 12 | Comp AI | ||
ReasonsComp AI: No rate card; the price is presented on a 20-minute call. Price factors are listed and a money-back guarantee is stated. Source: Comp AI pricing · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: The pricing URL returned Page Not Found; the site offers a Compliance Cost Calculator instead of prices. Source: Scrut pricing URL · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| Questionnaires and trust center · 10 | Tie | ||
ReasonsComp AI: A trust center or questionnaire product is not described on pages reviewed. Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: A Vendor Risk Analyst Teammate is described; a trust center or questionnaire allowance is not described on pages reviewed. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| AI assistance · 10 | Scrut | ||
ReasonsComp AI: AI automation across SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR; individual AI agent features are not itemized on pages reviewed. Its codebase is open source. Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 Scrut: Seven named agentic Teammates, from Onboarding Analyst to Security Analyst, usable in the Scrut Platform or an MCP-compatible client. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 | |||
| Weighted total | 5.84/10 | 5.34/10 | Comp AI |
What do Comp AI and Scrut publish about price and plans?
Comp AI
No rate card published. Comp AI says it presents the price on a 20-minute call and lists the factors: frameworks, company size, timeline, audit and security needs. A money-back guarantee is stated.
Source: Comp AI pricing · read 2026-09-29
No plan names published on the pages we read.
Scrut
No public pricing; the pricing URL returned Page Not Found. The site offers a Compliance Cost Calculator.
Source: Scrut pricing URL · read 2026-09-29
No plan names published on the pages we read.
Neither Comp AI nor Scrut publishes a price, so a cost comparison needs a quote from each.
How do the published facts compare?
| Fact | Comp AI | Scrut |
|---|---|---|
| Customers stated | 1,000+ companies, stated on its homepage Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 | 2,500+ customers, stated on its homepage and startup page Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
| Frameworks stated | SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, SOC 1, NIST, ISO 42001, ISO 9001, CCPA, NEN 7510 and FedRAMP quoted on its pricing page; no total count published Source: Comp AI pricing · read 2026-09-29 | 70+ frameworks on its homepage; its startup page says 60+ Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
| Integrations stated | 580+ integrations Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 | Its Evidence Collector is described with AWS, GitHub, Okta and 150+ integrations Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
| Service model | 1:1 Slack support with experts; Comp AI says they respond in under 3 minutes (vendor claim). Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 | Its startup offer mentions expert guidance and a playbook. The Onboarding Analyst is one of its AI Teammates. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
| Audit path | Audit needs are a pricing factor; the auditor route is not described on pages reviewed. Source: Comp AI pricing · read 2026-09-29 | An AI Internal Auditor Teammate is described; an external audit route is not described on pages reviewed. Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
| Pen testing | Not described on pages reviewed | Not described on pages reviewed |
| Trust center and questionnaires | Not described on pages reviewed Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 | Not described on pages reviewed Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
| AI features | AI automation for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR; Open-source codebase on GitHub Source: Comp AI homepage · read 2026-09-29 Source: Comp AI open-source repository · read 2026-09-29 | Onboarding Analyst; Policy Architect; Evidence Collector; Internal Auditor; Risk Analyst (via MCP servers); Vendor Risk Analyst; Security Analyst; Works inside the Scrut Platform or your preferred MCP-compatible client Source: Scrut homepage · read 2026-09-29 |
Which frameworks do both name?
Named by both
Scrut states a framework count; names not recorded
Named by Comp AI only
- SOC 2
- SOC 1
- ISO 27001
- ISO 42001
- HIPAA
- GDPR
- PCI DSS
- CCPA
- FedRAMP
- NIST CSF 2.0
Named by Scrut only
Scrut states a framework count; names not recorded
A framework missing from a list was not named on the pages we read. It does not mean the vendor cannot support it; ask the vendor.
Should you choose Comp AI or Scrut?
Choose Comp AI if
- you weight integrations: Comp AI scores 10 (States 580+ integrations, the highest published count in this lineup.)
- you weight switching help: Comp AI scores 6 (Offers 1:1 Slack support with experts; Comp AI says they respond in under 3 minutes (vendor claim).)
- Stay with Comp AI if integration breadth and an open-source codebase are why you chose it.
Choose Scrut if
- you weight AI assistance: Scrut scores 9 (Seven named agentic Teammates, from Onboarding Analyst to Security Analyst, usable in the Scrut Platform or an MCP-compatible client.)
- you weight framework coverage: Scrut scores 8 (States 70+ frameworks on its homepage (60+ on its startup page), with a Unified Control Framework.)
- Stay with Scrut if its AI Teammates and MCP support are how your team wants to work.
Before you move
Check the timing against your audit period and export your evidence history first.
Questions people ask
Is Comp AI better than Scrut?
On our weights Comp AI scores higher (5.84 vs 5.34). Comp AI leads on switching help, integrations, audit path, and pricing transparency and Scrut leads on framework coverage and AI assistance, so the better choice depends on which criteria matter to you.
Which is cheaper, Comp AI or Scrut?
Neither Comp AI nor Scrut publishes a price, so a cost comparison needs a quote from each.
Can I switch from Comp AI to Scrut during an audit?
You can, but plan it around the audit period: a Type II report covers a period of time, and your auditor will need evidence for all of it. Export evidence and policies before you leave and agree the approach with your auditor first. What your auditor needs when you change tools.